2 day old newborn is presenting to your office for

Typically, when discussing secondary impacts we see a disproportionate impact on vulnerable communities more so than affluent. However, I would think that because of population density in many CA metro areas that the impact may be spread out across socioeconomic demographics (think expensive homes on hillsides, hillside enclaves, etc…) with the main difference being the ability to adequately recover from an incident; i.e., more affluent can go live somewhere else while lower income have less options and/or become vulnerable as a result. Is that a fair way to look at impact of these hazards or are there actual differences in how those differing communities are impacted?

******CLICK ORDER NOW BELOW AND OUR WRITERS WILL WRITE AN ANSWER TO THIS ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT, DISCUSSION, ESSAY, HOMEWORK OR QUESTION YOU MAY HAVE. OUR PAPERS ARE PLAGIARISM FREE*******."