Journal Article Evaluation: Using a critical appraisal
Journal Article Evaluation: Using a critical appraisal tool Articles name Mete, R., Shield, A., Murray, K., Bacon, R., & Kellett, J. (2019). What is healthy eating? A qualitative exploration. Public Health Nutrition, 22(13), 2408-2418. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980019001046 In-text citation: (Mete et al., 2019) https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/public-health-nutrition/article/what-is-healthy-eating-a-qualitative-exploration/FA9E123D24D14365C16EB618B0077A8A This task requires using one of the critical appraisal tools supplied from a link below. Choose an appraisal tool that fits the chosen article to evaluation. JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research Reviewer ______________________________________ Date_______________________________ Author_______________________________________ Year_________ Record Number_________ Yes No Unclear Not applicable Is there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology? â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ Is there congruity between the research methodology and the research or objectives? â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ Is there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data? â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ Is there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data? â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ Is there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results? â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ Is there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically? â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ Is the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice- versa, addressed? â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ Are participants, and their voices, adequately represented? â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ Is the research ethical according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body? â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ Do the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data? â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ â–¡ Overall appraisal: Include â–¡ Exclude â–¡ Seek further info â–¡ Essay Format: The article evaluation must be presented in an essay format, with an introduction, body and conclusion. Introduction: The introduction must introduce the article, including proper referencing of the article, and a discussion about why you chose that article to evaluate. Body: In the body of your essay you must: 1. Use the critical appraisal tool you have chosen to evaluate all the sections of the research study, including the title, abstract and declarations. 2. Throughout the body of your essay you are to refer to the chosen critical appraisal tool and use additional references to support your evaluation. Subheadings may be used. 3.. Provide a referenced definition of Evidence Based Practice (EBP), and a recommendation as to how well the findings from this study may be incorporated into EBP. Give reasons and offer evidence to support your evaluation. Conclusion: A brief discussion of the overall quality of the study with reference to the strengths and weaknesses as outlined in the body of the essay. Please elaborate well SCIENCE HEALTH SCIENCE NURSING NURSING EBP107
******CLICK ORDER NOW BELOW AND OUR WRITERS WILL WRITE AN ANSWER TO THIS ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT, DISCUSSION, ESSAY, HOMEWORK OR QUESTION YOU MAY HAVE. OUR PAPERS ARE PLAGIARISM FREE*******."