To prepare: Review your current Prospectus Form, the existing review

To prepare: Review your current Prospectus Form, the existing review question, and your proposed capstone topic. Review Stage 2 “Literature Review Strategies” and “Critical Appraisal” information in the DHA Integrative Review Doctoral Study Guidebook. Collate the sources that you have collected thus far related to your capstone topic and review question. Students are encouraged to use sources from prior classes. These can be resources justifying the review question, supporting the gap in practice, identifying the theory/framework, etc. Continue to gather literature related to your review question and organize each resource into the DHA Literature Review Matrix. Your goal is to collect approximately 20 sources that could meaningfully contribute to your Capstone research. Some resources that sound promising may turn out to be poorly aligned with your review question upon closer examination. Therefore, be mindful that you will need to evaluate more than 20 sources to end up with 20 worth including. The Assignment: Literature Review Matrix Use the DHA Literature Review Matrix to organize and summarize the findings from each of your resources. Your completed DHA Literature Review Matrix should contain analyses for at least 20 sources. Note: Your 20 sources should include a variety of types of sources. Make sure at least 5 of them are peer-reviewed research sources and at least 5 are nonresearch sources. DHA Integrative Review Project Prospectus Form (For Students that started the DHA program in Fall 2021 or after) Students | Complete your DHA project planning using this form. This form must be completed exactly as instructed in the appendix to be approved. For additional information and resources, refer to the DHA Project Completion page. There are five sections on the form to complete that must be approved by your committee. The six sections include: Research Problem Purpose and Review Question Framework Significance Research Alignment Table Appendix (The appendix provides examples and instructions on how to complete this form) Submit this completed form into MyDR for formal evaluation and feedback when your project mentor indicates that you are ready to do so. Student’s Name | Lakisha Brown Student ID | | A01184950 Program | DHA Submission Date | 9/15/2024 *Remember that your study focus must be within the realm of your program and specialization area. Evaluators Only | Complete this section and provide feedback on responses and rubric scores in the form where noted. Mentor’s Name | Click or tap here to enter text. Overall Assessment: Choose an item. Co-Mentor’s Name | Click or tap here to enter text. Overall Assessment: Choose an item. Working Title (Click here for instructions and examples) Provide a concise (aim for 12 words or fewer) working title for this study. (Be sure to include your HSO type and practice-based problem.) Exploring the expansion of mental health programs. Section 1: Practice-based Problem (Click here for instructions and examples) Healthcare Services Organization (HSO) Type With no more than 1-2 sentences identify and describe your selected HSO type. The type of healthcare service organization (HSO) in focus is Behavioral Health Facility. Three Rivers Behavioral Health provides specialized mental health and substance use services, positioning it as a critical facility for treating psychiatric and addiction-related issues. HSO Problem of Interest What is the healthcare services organization (HSO) problem of interest that prompted you to search the literature to find out more? Write only 1-2 complete sentences using a scholarly tone. The primary problem of interest in this research is the inefficiencies in administrative processes that contribute to patient dissatisfaction and operational delays at Three Rivers Behavioral Health. Healthcare Administration Problem In one sentence, what is your healthcare administration problem? This will be more focused than the problem of interest noted above. The healthcare administration problem to be addressed is the inadequate integration of administrative policies and patient care systems, resulting in delays and inconsistencies in service delivery. Health Administration Research Domains Which DHA research domain does your healthcare administration problem align with? Quality Improvement Healthcare Administration Research Problem Justification Sources Provide a minimum of 3 sources that clearly state in the conclusion or research findings of the published source that a healthcare administration problem currently exists. Source 1 (Required) Full APA Citation: Johnson, A. B., & Smith, C. D. (2022). Impact of administrative inefficiencies on patient satisfaction in behavioral health settings. Journal of Healthcare Management, 67(3), 215-230. https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-21-00142 Purpose of Research (1 sentence only): This study aimed to examine the impact of administrative inefficiencies on patient satisfaction in behavioral health settings. Author’s Conclusion or Results of Research (1 sentence only): The research found that poorly integrated administrative systems significantly contributed to longer wait times and decreased patient satisfaction in mental health facilities. How this relates to my study (1 sentence only): This study directly supports the need to address administrative inefficiencies at Three Rivers Behavioral Health to improve patient experience and operational effectiveness. Source 2 (Required) Full APA Citation: Lee, E. F., & Brown, G. H. (2023). The relationship between administrative processes and quality of care in psychiatric hospitals. Psychiatric Services, 74(2), 132-145. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.202200237 Purpose of Research (1 sentence only): To investigate the relationship between administrative processes and quality of care in psychiatric hospitals. Author’s Conclusion or Results of Research (1 sentence only): The study concluded that streamlined administrative protocols were associated with improved patient outcomes and higher quality of care ratings. Hospitals with efficient administrative processes showed a 15% increase in positive patient outcomes and a 20% improvement in care quality ratings. How this relates to my study (1 sentence only): These findings underscore the importance of optimizing administrative processes at Three Rivers Behavioral Health to enhance overall care quality. Source 3 (Required) Full APA Citation: Chen, Y. T., & Davis, R. M. (2021). Integrated healthcare information systems and operational efficiency in mental health facilities. Health Informatics Journal, 27(1), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458220956892 Purpose of Research (1 sentence only): To assess the impact of integrated healthcare information systems on operational efficiency in mental health facilities. Author’s Conclusion or Results of Research (1 sentence only): Results indicated that facilities with well-integrated information systems experienced reduced operational delays and improved coordination of patient care. Mental health facilities that implemented integrated systems saw a 30% reduction in administrative processing time and a 25% improvement in care coordination metrics. How this relates to my study (1 sentence only): This research highlights the potential benefits of improving administrative system integration at Three Rivers Behavioral Health to address operational inefficiencies. Practice Gap Statement Now that you have identified a current healthcare administration problem you will compose a Practice Gap Statement (PGS) following the example and instructions in the appendix. Your PGS should not be longer that 2-3 sentences. There is a gap in practice related to the lack of streamlined administrative protocols, which hampers the effectiveness of healthcare delivery and negatively impacts patient outcomes. Practice Gap Sources Provide a minimum of 1 source that clearly states desired ideal state of professional practice related to your healthcare administration problem. Source 1 (Required) Full APA Citation: Wilson, K. L., & Thompson, J. R. (2023). Best practices in administrative efficiency for behavioral health organizations. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 50(2), 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-022-01203-4 Desired Ideal State of Professional Practice: The ideal state involves seamlessly integrated administrative and clinical systems that facilitate efficient patient flow, minimize delays, and enhance overall care quality in behavioral health settings. This includes automated appointment scheduling, electronic health records that communicate across departments, and streamlined admission and discharge processes. Source 2 (Optional) Full APA Citation: Click or tap here to enter text. Desired Ideal State of Professional Practice: Click or tap here to enter text. Section 1: Feedback and Scoring Project mentors will provide a scoring of “Met” or “Not Met” for this section. In the case of a “Not Met” scoring detailed feedback will be included on how to successfully revise the specific elements above. Mentor Met ☐ Not Met ☐ Detailed Feedback: Click or tap here to enter text. Program Met ☐ Not Met ☐ Detailed Feedback: Click or tap here to enter text. Section 2: Purpose and Review Questions (Click here for instructions and examples) The research purpose and review questions must be derived entirely by the sources provided in section 1. Research Purpose To address your stated problem, what is the purpose of your study using no more than 1-2 sentences?? The purpose of this research is to identify strategies to improve operational efficiency and patient satisfaction. Review Question(s) Conclude with your review question. (1 sentences) How do current administrative processes at Three Rivers Behavioral Health impact patient care efficiency, staff effectiveness, and overall patient satisfaction, and what evidence-based strategies can be implemented to optimize these processes for improved healthcare delivery and outcomes? Section 2: Feedback and Scoring Project mentors will provide a scoring of “Met” or “Not Met” for this section. In the case of a “Not Met” scoring detailed feedback will be included on how to successfully revise the specific elements above. Mentor Met ☐ Not Met ☐ Detailed Feedback: Click or tap here to enter text. Program Met ☐ Not Met ☐ Detailed Feedback: Click or tap here to enter text. Author/ Date Theoretical/ Conceptual Framework Research Question(s)/ Hypotheses Methodology Analysis & Results Conclusions Implications for Future research Implications For practice Empirical Research (Yes or No) Lerner, T. (2012, December 8) Based on principles of formative assessment and feedback cycles. Can be linked to constructivist learning theories where learning happens through revision and improvement Not explicitly stated, but implied questions: How does iterative feedback improve student outcomes? How do specific critiques foster student growth? Descriptive case study of a first-grade student’s experience with feedback and multiple drafts in a learning environment. Improvement in the quality of the student’s work (drawing of a butterfly) through multiple feedback-driven drafts. Progress tracked through visual comparisons of each draft. Students can make significant improvements in their work through repeated feedback and revisions. Feedback should be constructive, specific, and kind to promote learning. Future research could explore how different types of feedback (peer, teacher, self) impact the quality of student work overtime, and in different subject areas. Teachers should encourage students to create multiple drafts, provide structured feedback, and foster a growth mindset in students by normalizing revision as part of the learning process. No Black, P., &William, D. (1998) The framework is rooted in formative assessment theory. This article focuses on the idea that assessment should be used as a tool for learning rather than solely for evaluating what students know at the end of a learning process. How does formative assessment impact student learning? They hypothesize that continuous assessment, when integrated effectively in the classroom, leads to measurable improvements in student performance. The paper is based on a literature review and meta-analysis of existing studies on formative assessment. They analyze both qualitative and quantitative studies to understand the effectiveness of formative assessment in improving academic outcomes across various educational contexts. The meta-analysis demonstrates that formative assessment leads to significant improvement in student achievement, particularly when the feedback is specific, timely, and focused on task improvement rather than the student’s ability or intelligence. Studies showed that students who received formative feedback performed better on subsequent tasks compared to those who did not. Black and Wiliam conclude that formative assessment is a powerful tool for enhancing learning outcomes. The effectiveness of feedback depends on its specificity and how it’s used to guide student learning. Future studies could investigate how different types of feedback (written vs. verbal) or the timing of feedback (immediate vs. delayed) affect student learning outcomes. Research might also explore the effects of formative assessment in non-traditional classroom settings or across different age groups. Teachers should integrate formative assessments into daily classroom activities. Feedback should be part of an ongoing process, not just at the end of a unit. Teachers should also ensure that feedback is focused on task improvement rather than simply praising or criticizing student ability. Yes Resources: Lawless, J., & Foster, M. J. (2020). Searching systematically and comprehensively. In C. E. Toronto & R. Remington (Eds.), A step-by-step guide to conducting an integrative review (pp. 21-44). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37504-1 ten Ham, W., Minnie, K., & van der Walt, C. (2016). Integrative review of benefit levers’ characteristics for system-wide spread of best healthcare practicesLinks to an external site.. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(1), 33-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12814 Walden University Office of Research and Doctoral Services. (n.d.). DHA Integrative Review Doctoral Study GuidebookLinks to an external site.. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/research-center/program-documents/DHAFall2021 Review the following, Stage 2: Conducting the DHA Doctoral Project Analysis Literature Review Strategies Literature Quality Appraisal

******CLICK ORDER NOW BELOW AND OUR WRITERS WILL WRITE AN ANSWER TO THIS ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT, DISCUSSION, ESSAY, HOMEWORK OR QUESTION YOU MAY HAVE. OUR PAPERS ARE PLAGIARISM FREE*******."