I. In connection with the RaDonda Vaught case, respond to

I. In connection with the RaDonda Vaught case, respond to the following questions: a. Explain how each of the four elements of malpractice were or were not met in the situation. See AJN series: “The Elements of a Nursing Malpractice Case, Parts 1-4” in the SCF Library Guide for this course. b. How can you protect yourself from malpractice allegations or lawsuits? Discuss a minimum of three ways to protect yourself from malpractice as set forth in Austin’s article: “7 Legal Tips for Safe Nursing Practice”. c. What do you think organizations can do to promote patient safety and to reduce the practice of workarounds? II. Read the Case Presentation, “Trying to Be Heard” on page 117, Chapter 7, in Burkhardt & Nathaniel’s textbook. It is the last case study in Chapter 7; discuss a-c below: a. Does the ANA Code of Ethics, Provision Three, specifically Interpretive Statement 3.5 of Provision 3, offer any guidance for the nurse, Joanna? Why or why not? You must include application of Interpretive Statement 3.5 to earn full credit. b. Were the nurse’s actions sufficient in this situation? c. Apply the “CODE” analysis from the article titled “Pathways to Moral Courage” to the facts of Joanna’s case to determine how a different outcome might have been possible. Apply each letter of the acronym CODE to the facts of this case.

******CLICK ORDER NOW BELOW AND OUR WRITERS WILL WRITE AN ANSWER TO THIS ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT, DISCUSSION, ESSAY, HOMEWORK OR QUESTION YOU MAY HAVE. OUR PAPERS ARE PLAGIARISM FREE*******."