Question 36 (Mandatory) (1 point) Risks and

Question 36 (Mandatory) (1 point) Risks and benefits according to the Belmont Report must be explained in which way? Question 36 options: Risks and benefits are assumed to be covered in the research study and are advantageous to the subjects wellbeing. There is no need to assess subject’s rights have been protected. Beneficence thus requires protection against risk of harm to subjects. Only include what is essential for the subjects to be willing to voluntarily participate; nothing stressful or distressing. A careful array of relevant data, including, in some cases, alternative ways of obtaining the benefits sought in the research. Public information may be included in social research from which of these venues? Question 37 options: Vital statistics. Motor vehicle registrations. Court records. All of the above. Previous PageNext Page Question 38 (Mandatory) (1 point) Human Subject Protection in the form of Investigational Review Boards IRB) was developed in response to Question 38 options: protecting participants following probable circumstances of harm to subjects in prior research endeavors. raising money for the protection of human subjects for the purpose of reimbursement. preventing harm to human subjects in European research. prevention of high insurance costs for human subjects. Question 39 (Mandatory) (1 point) Human subjects participating in medical or nursing research need to be aware of which of the following is accurate? Question 39 options: Major risk or injury is expected Deceptive practices are to be avoided Anonymity and Confidentiality are forfeited Subjects may not withdraw until the end of the study Question 40 (Mandatory) (1 point) Why does informed consent need to be addressed in research studies? Question 40 options: Research subjects can only hope for just treatment, confidentiality, anonymity, and to be apprised of new pertinent findings. Human subjects may give involuntary consent when needed. Subjects must realize once in the study, they are in until it ends. Adequate information about the research and comprehension of the risk/benefits ratio are important to self-determination. Question 41 (Mandatory) (1 point) Which is an example of ethical misconduct involving harm to research subjects who were not told about penicillin curing syphilis in 1940? Question 41 options: The Belmont report. The Tuskegee Study. Nuremberg Code. Declaration of Helsinki. Question 42 (Mandatory) (1 point) Social and Behavioral research may include which of the following populations? Question 42 options: Small groups. Families. Communities. All of the above. Question 43 (Mandatory) (1 point) Ethically research participants may not do which of the following? Question 43 options: Withdraw from the study. Ask questions of the researchers. Self-determine their decision, Give involuntary consent. Question 44 (Mandatory) (1 point) Which of the following statements about the consent form for research are true ? Question 44 options: Video taping or recording of the consent process may be done with copies for the researcher and the subject. The consent form should have explanations that are as free of medical jargon as possible and be easy to read explanations at a low reading level. The consent form addresses time constraints, ability to withdraw at any time without retaliation, and plan for medical/psychiatric care if needed. All of the above. Question 45 (Mandatory) (1 point) Fraudulent studies with scientific misconduct have necessitated creation of federal agencies to oversee the honesty in obtaining new scientific knowledge in which of the following areas? Question 45 options: In conduct In reporting in publication All of the above Question 46 (Mandatory) (1 point) Social and behavioral research avoids the high probability of which risk or type of harm? Question 46 options: Physical. Psychological. Economical. Social. Question 47 (Mandatory) (1 point) Which of the following are guidelines that were developed for the protection of human subjects included in research to avoid unethical conduct such as withholding of new findings, intentional injury, or harm? Question 47 options: Nuremberg Trials. Declaration of Helsinki in 1964 and 1975. Tuskegee Alabama Syphilis Study of 1940. All of the above. Question 48 (Mandatory) (1 point) Written consent to participate in research may be waived in certain circumstances if the subject claims what? Question 48 options: Fear of not remaining anonymous. Having three legal witnesses. Participated last year. Having retained a lawyer. Previous PageNext Page Question 49 (Mandatory) (1 point) The researchers and community partners are responsible for ethically treating human subjects in research studies by following which of these statements? Question 49 options: Believing that the Institutional Review Board will ensure the safety of all subjects. . Knowing that historically human subjects have never been misinformed or mistreated. Requiring all research personnel to participate in protection of human subjects training. Relying on the innate ethics, compassion, and integrity of all research personnel. Question 50 (Mandatory) (1 point) The Belmont Report did not include covering which category? Question 50 options: Applications of the principles: informed consent, risk/benefit assessment, and selection of subjects. To protect all subjects, questions may only be asked prior to the beginning of the study and subjects may only withdraw at the end of the study. Subjects review the research procedure, the purposes, risk and anticipated benefits, and potential alternative treatment prior to giving consent. The ethical principles of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice for protection of human subjects.

******CLICK ORDER NOW BELOW AND OUR WRITERS WILL WRITE AN ANSWER TO THIS ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT, DISCUSSION, ESSAY, HOMEWORK OR QUESTION YOU MAY HAVE. OUR PAPERS ARE PLAGIARISM FREE*******."