Solved by verified expert
Question
Answered step-by-step
Asked by glorybihamba
A. Discuss a healthcare safety concern using the SBAR (situation, background, assessment, recommendation) format by doing the following:
1. Describe a healthcare-related situation prompting a patient safety concern (S).
2. Analyze background information about the concern by doing the following (B):
a. Describe the data that support or would support the need for change.
b. Explain how one or more national patient safety standards apply to this situation.
3. Discuss the impact of the safety concern on the patient(s), staff, and organization (A).
a. Explain how the safety concern affects value for the patient(s) and the organization.
4. Recommend an evidence-based practice change that addresses the safety concern (R).
a. Discuss how this recommendation aligns with the principles of a high reliability organization.
b. Describe two potential barriers to the recommended practice change.
c. Identify two potential interventions to minimize the barriers from part A4b to the recommended practice change.
d. Discuss the significance of shared decision-making in implementing this recommendation.
e. Describe an outcome measure that could be used to evaluate the results of the recommendation.
f. Discuss how the care delivery model in this organization would be impacted by this change.
B. Acknowledge sources, using APA-formatted in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
C. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
File Restrictions
File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
File size limit: 200 MB
File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z
RUBRIC
A1:SAFETY CONCERN
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not describe a healthcare-related situation.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission describes a healthcare-related situation, but the situation would not be regarded as a plausible patient safety concern given current healthcare practices.
COMPETENT
The submission describes a healthcare-related situation that could be regarded as a plausible patient safety concern given current healthcare practices.
A2A:DATA
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not describe any data.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission describes data, but the description is general in nature, or the described data does not demonstrate the need for change to address the situation in part A1.
COMPETENT
The submission describes specific data that demonstrates the need for change to address the situation in part A1.
A2B:NATIONAL SAFETY STANDARD(S)
NOT EVIDENT
An explanation referencing at least 1 national patient safety standard is not provided.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The explanation references at least 1 national patient safety standard but does not correctly address how each referenced standard applies to the situation described in part A1.
COMPETENT
The explanation references at least 1 national patient safety standard and correctly addresses how each referenced standard applies to the situation described in part A1.
A3:IMPACT
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not discuss the impact of the safety concern from part A1.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission does not logically discuss the impact of the safety concern described in part A1 as it specifically relates to the patient(s), staff, or organization.
COMPETENT
The submission logically discusses the impact of the safety concern described in part A1 as it specifically relates to the patient(s), staff, and organization.
A3A:VALUE
NOT EVIDENT
An explanation of how the safety concern from part A1 affects value for the patient(s) and the organization is not provided.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission explains how the safety concern from part A1 affects value for the patient(s) and the organization, but the explanation is illogical or contains inaccuracies.
COMPETENT
The submission logically and accurately explains how the safety concern from part A1 affects value for the patient(s) and the organization.
A4:EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CHANGE
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not provide a recommendation for a practice change.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission provides a recommendation for a practice change, but the recommendation is not evidence-based. Or it is irrelevant to the safety concern described in part A1 or would not logically address the concern.
COMPETENT
The submission provides a recommendation for an evidence-based practice change that is relevant to the safety concern described in part A1 and would logically address the concern.
A4A:HIGH RELIABILITY ORGANIZATION
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not discuss how the recommendation in part A4 aligns with the principles of any organization.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission discusses how the recommendation in part A4 aligns with the principles of an organization, but the alignment discussed is not specific to a high reliability organization.
COMPETENT
The submission accurately discusses how the recommendation in part A4 aligns with the principles of a high reliability organization.
A4B:POTENTIAL BARRIERS
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not describe any potential barriers to the recommended practice change.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission describes only 1 potential barrier to the recommended practice change. Or the description is irrelevant to the safety concern in part A1.
COMPETENT
The submission describes 2 potential barriers to the recommended practice change that are relevant to the safety concern in part A1.
A4C:POTENTIAL INTERVENTIONS
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not identify any potential interventions to minimize the barriers from part A4b to change.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission identifies only 1 potential intervention that could minimize the barriers from part A4b to change. Or 1 or both interventions are not relevant to the recommended practice change.
COMPETENT
The submission identifies 2 potential interventions that could minimize the barriers from part A4b to the recommended practice change.
A4D:SHARED DECISION-MAKING
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not discuss the significance of shared decision-making in implementing any recommendation.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission does not logically discuss the significance of shared decision-making in implementing the proposed recommendation in part A4. Or the discussion is general in nature or does not specifically relate to the implementation of the proposed recommendation in part A4.
COMPETENT
The submission logically discusses the significance of shared decision-making, and the discussion specifically relates to the implementation of the proposed recommendation in part A4.
A4E:OUTCOME MEASURE
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not describe any outcome measures that could be used to evaluate the results of any recommendation.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission describes an outcome measure, but it could not be used to evaluate the results of the proposed recommendation in part A4, or the outcome measure is irrelevant to the proposed recommendation in part A4.
COMPETENT
The submission describes a relevant outcome measure that could be used to evaluate the results of the proposed recommendation in part A4.
A4F:CARE DELIVERY MODEL
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not discuss how the organization would be impacted by any change.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission discusses the care delivery model that exists in the organization but does not include a relevant impact of the change recommended in A4.
COMPETENT
The submission discusses how the care delivery model that exists in the organization could have a relevant impact on the change recommended in A4.
B:APA SOURCES
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not include in-text citations and references according to APA style for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized but does not demonstrate a consistent application of APA style.
COMPETENT
The submission includes in-text citations and references for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and demonstrates a consistent application of APA style.
C:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION
NOT EVIDENT
Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.
COMPETENT
Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and
SCIENCE
HEALTH SCIENCE
NURSING
BS NURSING D221
******CLICK ORDER NOW BELOW AND OUR WRITERS WILL WRITE AN ANSWER TO THIS ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT, DISCUSSION, ESSAY, HOMEWORK OR QUESTION YOU MAY HAVE. OUR PAPERS ARE PLAGIARISM FREE*******."
